User talk:64.56.25.15
>Does this mean that now some of the more outrageous, completely undocumentable, claims for 4e 'benefits' will also receive some scrutiny?
- Mostly I wanted people to stop the damn editwar going back and forth over the word "verified/unverified". When I play janitor, I've been doing it to keep the trolls and HAET out of the benefits section, and the 4rries and dicksucking out of the criticism section. --NotBrandX 23:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't stick the {{fact}} in there because I wanted someone to shut up, I put it there because I knew whoever said it had facts to back it up, and the facts would be more interesting. If people are reading the criticism section because they want to RAAAAAAGE, then give them good ammunition. I'll kick the tyres on the bennies section too, to make sure the 4rries are well-armed. When debates break out, I want to see boxing matches, not slapfights. --NotBrandX 23:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Well, the fact is now documented. So, will you stop that guy from saying it's 'unproven', at the very least?
DnD 4e page[edit]
The article needs fundamentally restructured. Step one in that process is getting rid of the gigantic eyesore bullet lists of misinformation and marketing that were making the page unreadable and useless. --74.85.80.191 21:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Identify yourself, please. Never mind, sockpuppet, I know who you are now. Not surprising, really.
http://boards.4chan.org/tg/res/10094678 --Zabasaz 21:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Your cowardice is, indeed, limitless. I'm impressed.
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
