24.94.237.251

Okay, I've followed your spree of deletetion for a few days now, and I think it's time that you begin using the Talk pages before just cutting of swathes of the pages. You might be right in your assesment, but just cutting off stuff from any page you come across like that is simply rude. Relevant or not, that shit's something people have been working on, and cutting so large ammounts of script out of that is borderline vandalism. Valid maybe, but still rude. TheWiseDane (talk) 22:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

• I am not interested in your opinion of whether or not I am being rude in deleting material that has no business cluttering up articles. This is not a wiki for people to push their social agendas. The material I have removed is not related to tabletop gaming or /tg/. You by your own admission are not even a user of /tg/ so I wonder what your purpose is in following me and other users around to question their editing on this wiki. I will grant you the benefit of the doubt that you are simply asking questions that you wish to know the answers to. I will however at least make a note on my reasons for removing material that is unsuitable for a tabletop gaming and chan culture wiki. --24.94.237.251
  • I on the other hand do use /tg/ and agree with you, but that does not change the fact that this wiki does not run by fiat nor does it have to listen to your interpretation alone. Those edits should also be discussed with other users so a consensus can be made properly. Use the talk page for the main page if you believe there is an agenda being pushed, and then only delete if there is an agreement to do so. Otherwise, the only one pushing an agenda here is YOU.--Newerfag (talk) 22:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Understood and I will follow the proper channels in the future. There is quite a bit of work to be done to clean this wiki up. --24.94.237.251 (talk)
      • When is there not? But remember that a statement of fact does not a diatribe make, and that your efforts would be better suited to adding wanted pages and expanding stubs. I have learned this the hard way, and while I myself struggle to keep it in mind, at least I'm trying to do so. --Newerfag (talk) 23:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Looking at the offending edits, the reasoning there is a lot like my own in that it's focusing specifically on what he percieves to be excessive focus on percieved issues of sexism/racism. While I agree that this wiki should not waste time on social issues that most of us have minimal comprehension of, the very least he could do is explain his reasoning to the rest of the community. --Newerfag (talk) 22:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Brusque or no, you're doing the Emperor's work, anon. Keep it up. --Asorel (talk) 00:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Hektor Heresy

The Legions and Primarchs currently "in play" are those listed here. You might find it helpful to use the project's forum. --Lumey (talk) 22:04, 28 August 2015 (UTC)